Iran tried to shoot down US Reaper drone that arrived on scene of oil tanker attacks: officials

FoxNews – Iran fired a missile – but missed – at an American drone on Thursday after the supposed Iranian attack on oil tankers, while another U.S. drone was shot down by Iran-backed rebels in Yemen in recent days.

A senior U.S. official told Fox News that an MQ9 Reaper drone was fired on by the Iranians on Thursday shortly after it arrived at the scene where the MV Altair tanker sent out a distress signal amid the attacks the U.S. says were perpetrated by Iran.

The official said the first distress call from the MV Altair tanker, a Marshall Islands-flagged but Norwegian-owned crude oil tanker, went out at 6:12am local time. The unmanned MQ9 Reaper drone arrived 8 minutes later.

Then at 6:45am local time, a missile was fired at the drone, but missed. The U.S. military said that it was a modified SA-7 fired from Iran’s mainland. It was fired on after the drone arrived on station to assist the Norwegian tanker.

Officials also told Fox News that a U.S. MQ9 drone was shot down in Yemen by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in recent days.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has blamed Iran for the “blatant assault” on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman earlier Thursday.

In a news conference, Pompeo said: “This assessment is based on intelligence, the weapons used, the level of expertise needed to execute the operation, recent similar Iranian attacks on shipping, and the fact that no proxy group operating in the area has the resources and proficiency to act with such a high degree of sophistication.”

He charged that Iran was working to disrupt the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz and this is a deliberate part of a campaign to escalate tension, adding that the U.S. would defend its forces and interests in the region, although he did not elaborate.

President Trump, meanwhile, told “Fox and Friends” Friday morning that the attack had “Iran written all over it.’“[Iran is] a nation of terror and they’ve changed a lot since I’ve been president, I can tell you,” he added.

— President Trump

“Iran did do it and you know they did it because you saw the boat,” he said, before pointing to the video showing the Iranians removing the unexploded mine. “They’re a nation of terror and they’ve changed a lot since I’ve been president, I can tell you,” he added.

U.S. officials released a video Friday supposedly showing Iran’s Revolutionary Guard removing an unexploded limpet mine from one of the vessels.

The black-and-white footage, as well as still photos released by the U.S. military’s Central Command on Friday, appeared to show the limpet mine on the Japanese-owned Kokuka Courageous, before a Revolutionary Guard patrol boat pulled alongside the ship and removed the mine, Central Command spokesman Capt. Bill Urban said.

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin contributed to this report.

Source: US Government Class

Inside the $19 billion hole that’s ground zero for nuclear waste controversy

CBS News – About 100 miles outside Las Vegas, deep in a remote patch of desert, is a $19 billion hole in the ground. That’s how much it has cost to fight over and build a five-mile test tunnel under Yucca Mountain.  Now largely abandoned for almost a decade, it was designed to be the answer to America’s nuclear waste problem – a problem still piling up at faraway places, like San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant, midway between Los Angeles and San Diego, where engineers produced power for half a century.

San Onofre shut down in 2012. About 50 years’ worth of spent radioactive spent nuclear fuel – 536 tons of it – is temporarily buried beneath a massive concrete slab.

Ron Pontes, who helps manage the decommissioning of San Onofre, said, “The fact that Yucca Mountain had failed to materialize as the nation’s repository for spent nuclear fuel has stranded fuel, not only at this site but at sites across the nation.”

Congress designated Yucca Mountain as the location for a national permanent nuclear waste repository back in 1987.  A test tunnel was dug but never licensed.

Wyoming Senator John Barrasso is now pushing legislation that would restart the licensing of Yucca Mountain, a process the Obama administration put on hold almost a decade ago after opposition from a bipartisan group of Nevada politicians.

“It is an isolated location which has the right geology which can make the difference for safe use of nuclear power and storage of nuclear waste for generations and generations to come,” said Sen. Barrasso.

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada has been fighting Yucca Mountain for more than 20 years.

“Part of the infrastructure that is necessary is to build all of the rail lines that need to come across Nevada, across this country, to bring it there,” said Sen. Cortez Masto. “And a lot of those rail lines and the shipments would come right through the heart of Las Vegas.”

She said it would create a bottleneck for shipments of radioactive waste if Yucca Mountain goes online. “Two shipments a day for 50 years – what? I mean, it’s crazy,” Coretz Masto said.

Correspondent Jonathan Vigliotti received a rare tour of the tunnel at Yucca Mountain. He asked William Boyle, from the Department of Energy, how good a site it represents for storing the country’s nuclear waste, which will remain toxic for thousands of years.

“Well, the department felt it was good enough that we submitted the license application in 2008,” Boyle replied.

“Do you agree with that submission?” Vigliotti asked.

“It wouldn’t have been submitted if I didn’t agree,” he said.

But Sen. Cortez Masto disagrees. She says some scientists worry that water in the ground will mix with nuclear waste and enter the drinking supply of small, nearby farming communities. Boyle feels that risk is safely manageable.

The senator says the fight is over political science: “When they passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act we didn’t have any seniority at the time, in the state of Nevada, to be able to change that. And so literally, it got crammed down Nevada’s throat.”

Vigliotti asked, “At what point does time just run out in the debate and it becomes just such an issue that, [with] all of this waste collecting, we just say we have to put this somewhere?”

“It’s my impression that if we were to ask the people that live near San Onofre, live near San Diego, that they reached that point a while ago,” Boyle replied.

Temporarily storing nuclear waste at places like San Onofre is costing hundreds of millions of dollars – money subsidized by utility customers, taxpayers, and the very same federal government that can’t agree on what to do with it.

Ron Pontes said, “We collected money from our customers that went to the federal government, and they haven’t used that money to build anything. We would like to see the government do their job and come get the fuel like they promised.”

Source: US Government Class

Mexico’s Foreign Minister to Meet With Pence in Effort to Avoid Trump Tariffs

New York Times – WASHINGTON — Vice President Mike Pence will meet Wednesday with Mexico’s foreign minister as officials on both sides of the border try to avert the potentially crippling economic consequences of President Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on all Mexican imports.

Mr. Trump has vowed to impose a 5 percent tariff on all goods from Mexico beginning Monday and to increase the tax to 25 percent by October if Mexico does not prevent migrants from illegally entering the United States. Mr. Trump, speaking Tuesday in London, said that it was “more likely that the tariffs” would be imposed on Monday as he has threatened.

Mexican officials, along with Republican lawmakers, are trying to prevent that outcome. Marcelo Ebrard, the Mexican foreign minister, is scheduled to meet on Wednesday afternoon at the White House with Mr. Pence, a senior administration official said, in an effort to convince the president that Mexico is doing everything it can to help prevent illegal immigration across the United States border. As of Tuesday night in London, as he was preparing to leave for Washington, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was also expected to attend the meeting.

Mr. Trump, frustrated by what he views as Mexico’s failure to stem the flow of migrants, said he would use broad emergency powers to impose punishing tariffs on the country. But it remains unclear what Mexico could do to satisfy Mr. Trump and persuade him to back down.

Top American officials have spoken in vague terms about what steps Mexico must take. Still, Mr. Ebrard has expressed optimism, telling reporters on Tuesday in Washington that there was an 80 percent chance that Mr. Trump would not impose the tariffs.

Few in Washington shared his optimism for the high-stakes discussions as the clock ticked toward Monday’s deadline. Carlos Heredia, a professor at the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas in Mexico City, said Tuesday that whatever action Mexico takes to prevent migration into the United States, it was unlikely to satisfy the president.

“If there is any logic to the way that President Trump handles policy, it’s that he likes conflict,” Mr. Heredia said. “I don’t think that there is a way to please Trump.”

Mr. Trump’s threat to tax Mexican products has rattled financial markets and prompted an outcry from businesses that would be affected, including automakers, agricultural companies and retailers. The chairman of the Federal Reserve said on Tuesday that the central bank was watching Mr. Trump’s trade war warily and would act to prevent economic damage from the conflict.

Mr. Trump has made heavy use of tariffs on trading partners from China to Europe, but imposing tariffs on Mexico, the United States’ largest trading partner, would be a significant escalation in the president’s trade war. Mexico is a key supplier of products like fresh tomatoes and grapes; bluejeans; televisions; medical devices; and automobiles. Many companies have created supply chains that snake back and forth across the border — meaning some companies could be forced to pay Mr. Trump’s tariff multiple times as their products travel from farms to factories to consumers.

Businesses are also worried that the president’s move risks derailing what would be his signature trade achievement: passing the newly negotiated North American trade agreement.

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement was signed last year, but it still needs to be ratified by legislators in all three countries. Mexico submitted the text to its Senate hours before Mr. Trump’s threat. But Mexican officials are unlikely to move forward with that vote with the threat of tariffs hanging over them.

Mr. Ebrard, who has been in Washington all week meeting with Trump administration officials and members of Congress, said earlier in the week that Mexico was already enforcing its own immigration laws but argued that there was more the countries could do to work together. He said Mexican officials had come to Washington ready to “design actions together.”

Kevin McAleenan, the acting secretary of homeland security, repeated the administration’s demands in an interview with The Hill published on Tuesday. He said Mexico must crack down on illegal crossings from Guatemala, and use American intelligence to target smuggling operations that try to sneak migrants across the border.

Mr. McAleenan also said the administration expects Mexico to help tighten the shared border, even though the Mexican government has agreed to take in migrants while their asylum cases are processed in the United States.

“We can’t have the situation where 1,000 people in one group can cross the border at 4 a.m. without any interdiction or any effort to stop that unlawful activity,” said Mr. McAleenan, citing a group that illegally crossed last week into El Paso. The group of 1,036 migrants was the largest ever recorded by the Department of Homeland Security to cross illegally into the United States.

On Tuesday, Mr. Ebrard met for a half-hour with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and several other Democratic lawmakers.

Republican senators are also mobilizing to prevent the White House from moving ahead with tariffs, warning Mr. Trump on Tuesday that they were almost uniformly opposed to his plans to tax Mexican imports.

Several big states would be hit hard by the proposed tariffs on Mexican products, including Texas, Michigan, California, Illinois and Ohio, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

“We’re holding a gun to our own heads,” said Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas.

Source: US Government Class

Valerie Plame is running for Congress

Santa Fe New Mexican – Valerie Plame, a former CIA officer, author and lecturer, is running for Congress as a Democrat in the Northern New Mexico district.

“I love the idea of serving my country again,” Plame said in an interview Thursday morning.

Plame, 55, said she considered running for the U.S. Senate after incumbent Tom Udall announced he would not seek re-election to a third term.

She instead decide to run for the House of Representatives in the 3rd Congressional District.

The seat in the 3rd District also is open. The incumbent congressman, Democrat Ben Ray Luján, is running to succeed Udall in the Senate.

Plame said in a statement she considers herself best-known as “the covert CIA operations officer who was illegally outed by the Bush administration in 2003.”

This happened after her then-husband, Ambassador Joe Wilson, wrote a column revealing “falsehoods told to the American people that led to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.”

Plame lives in Santa Fe, key vote center of the Democrat-dominated 3rd District. She expects heavy competition for the nomination.

“I think it’s going to be packed,” she said of the Democratic primary in 2020.

Teresa Leger and Gavin Kaiser have filed with the Federal Election Commission as candidates for the seat. State Rep. Joseph Sanchez of Alcalde also has announced his candidacy.

Several other politicians say they are considering entering the congressional race.

Source: US Government Class

Governor signals new approach to pardons

Santa Fe New Mexican – Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signaled a new and more holistic approach to evaluating requests for pardons and other forms of clemency in guidelines published Wednesday.

The new guidelines provide the governor with greater flexibility and discretion in issuing pardons, spokesman Tripp Stelnicki said.

Lujan Grisham’s Republican predecessor, Susana Martinez, ruled out any clemency for people convicted of sexual offenses or repeatedly driving while intoxicated. The former prosecutor and death-penalty proponent issued just three pardons during eight years in office.

No pardons have been granted since Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, took office Jan. 1. Holdover applicants have been encouraged to reapply.

The new guidelines outline a gamut of pardon considerations, including whether the applicant has demonstrated personal growth and remorse and participated in restorative justice initiatives — a catchphrase for organized attempts to repair harm to crime victims or society.

“The governor’s pardoning power should only be exercised when doing so is in the interests of justice and equity,” the guidelines state. “In making this determination, the governor employs a holistic review that gives due consideration to the nature of the underlying offense and the applicant’s role in the underlying offense, the impact of the crime on any victim(s) and society as a whole, and any other factors weighing on the fundamental fairness.”

The Governor’s Office did not respond to questions about Lujan Grisham’s approach to pardon requests for nonviolent drug offenders.

Legislation signed by the governor in April reduces penalties for the possession of illegal drug paraphernalia or up to a half-ounce of marijuana to a petty misdemeanor and $50 fine on first offense. The state has a Medical Cannabis Program, although the state Senate balked this year at a proposal to authorize recreational marijuana sales.

Under the new clemency guidelines, applicants seeking to restore their right to bear arms must specifically make that request. It was unclear whether that provision is new.

The Governor’s Office did not respond to requests for information about new appointments to the Parole Board that typically provides recommendations on pardon applications.

Source: US Government Class

After uprising falls short, Venezuela’s opposition tries to regain momentum against the government

Washington Post – Venezuela’s opposition sought to maintain pressure Thursday on President Nicolás Maduro through further protests, as the embattled socialist leader convened a weekend of dialogue to critique his mandate and fine-tune “the revolution.”

Following a failed attempt to stage a peaceful military revolt Tuesday and overthrow Maduro, the opposition was facing a limited array of options.

Opposition leader Juan Guaidó on Wednesday called on Venezuelans to stage daily protests until Maduro leaves. The campaign, opposition officials said, included an appeal to public servants to show civil disobedience by wearing blue armbands to work.

After two days of violent protests that left two people dead and dozens wounded, the opposition was banking on a resilient populace to continue the effort — though it remained unclear how exhausted, crisis-battered Venezuelans would respond. Guaidó insisted late Wednesday that political change remains within Venezuela’s grasp.

“As long as we are mobilized and united, we are very close to achieving our freedom,” Guaidó said on the Fox Business Network. “Can’t tell you a specific date or time. Working on transition. Democracy has always taken time.”

At 6 a.m. on Thursday, Maduro appeared at a military base in western Caracas alongside Vladimir Padrino López, a member of the president’s inner circle who the Trump administration has said was negotiating his ouster.

“The empire is investing in dividing us and say there’s a civil war in Venezuela,” Maduro said, referring to the United States. “They say they have to intervene, to weaken our homeland. No matter the circumstance we have to be united, and that’s what loyalty is. It has to be a collective strength.”

The Trump administration has said that Maduro was prepared Tuesday to abandon office and flee to Havana, before being stopped by the Russians — a claim that Maduro strongly denied. Also on Fox, President Trump appeared less certain late Wednesday about Russian involvement, saying, “You hear rumors . . . rumors about Russia and a lot about Cuba.”

In a phone call with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov complained that the United States was clearly supporting opposition attempts to overthrow the government.

“The Russian side stressed that Washington’s interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state, and its threat against its leadership, was a gross violation of international law,” he said. Continuing to do so would entail “serious consequences,” he added.

Washington has also said that senior officials in Maduro’s administration have been negotiating his departure. On Tuesday, Maduro replaced his intelligence chief, Maj. Gen. Manuel Ricardo Cristopher Figuera, after he appeared to defect to the opposition.

While vowing to remain in power, Maduro late Wednesday issued a call for dialogue. Although he has repeatedly called for dialogue and admitted errors in the past, he has rarely engaged those who call his rule illegal after discredited elections last year. Nor has he enacted meaningful reform.

Nevertheless, Maduro decreed two days of open critique on Saturday and Sunday — sessions likely to be held within very strict parameters of debate.

He called for “action and proposals from all the people, so they tell Nicolás Maduro what we have to do to create a plan to change the revolution, to rectify mistakes in the middle of the battle.”

Thousands did answer Guaidó’s call to demonstrate on Wednesday, but they were confronted by security forces firing tear gas as the opposition struggled to regain momentum.

The lack of response by the army and police to Guaidó’s call for revolt left opposition supporters grappling with a sense of a pivotal moment lost. Many in the ranks remained resolute after a day of violence that left dozens injured and more detained. But there were also strains of confusion and disappointment.

“Yesterday, there were failures,” Mirna Pinto, a 69-year-old retired nurse, said Wednesday. “I expected something else.” But she nevertheless joined the opposition protests. “Success will come the day Maduro goes,” she said.

A protester was killed Wednesday, said doctors and the independent Venezuelan Observatory of Social Conflict, which tracks protests. Officials said Jurubith Garcia, 27, was hit by a bullet in eastern Caracas, where security forces were confronting protesters. Her death was the second in two days, and the 55th in protests this year.

On Tuesday, a 25-year-old man was fatally shot in the chest during a protest in the interior state of Aragua, the observatory said.

A pro-government rally on Wednesday next to Miraflores, the presidential palace, drew about 500 people, far fewer than the multiple rallies of thousands of people supporting Guaidó. Diosdado Cabello, one of Maduro’s top lieutenants, told the pro-government rally that opposition leaders were now “walking like zombies.”

While assertions by the U.S. administration that several senior officials in the regime were ready to break with Maduro did not pan out, the day’s developments did suggest a measure of intrigue and betrayal around the Venezuelan leader.

“Everyone around Maduro is trying to figure out where they’re going to be when the music stops — either sitting down beside him, in jail or out of the country, because, yes, the music is going to stop,” said a senior U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.

Guaidó may face a heightened risk of arrest after his actions Tuesday. Yet the fact that he was able to appear and openly speak at different points around the capital on Wednesday suggested the extent to which Maduro might still fear the domestic and international consequences of acting against him.

This oil-rich nation, once South America’s wealthiest per capita, has been paralyzed by the political stalemate and a growing humanitarian crisis. Hyperinflation, rising crime, power outages and shortages of medical supplies, food and water have reduced life for many to a daily struggle for survival. Millions have fled the country.

Maduro claimed victory in an election last year in which key opposition candidates were barred from running. The result was decried internationally as fraudulent. He is backed by Russia, China, Cuba and a few other nations.

Guaidó, the head of Venezuela’s opposition-controlled National Assembly, declared himself president in January. He calls Maduro a “usurper.”

Michael Brice-Saddler in Washington and Amie Ferris-Rotman in Moscow contributed to this story.

Source: US Government Class

New Mexico sees rare spike in referendum proposals

(Referendum” is a general term which refers to a measure that appears on the ballot. … The popular referendum is a device which allows voters to approve or repeal an act of the Legislature. If the Legislature passes a law that voters do not approve of, they may gather signatures to demand a popular vote on the law.)

Santa Fe New Mexican – Republicans in the New Mexico House of Representatives are not the only ones who want a referendum on the ballot in next year’s general election.

While the House GOP is calling for a vote on a new gun control law, the Secretary of State’s Office has received several other proposals for referendums on everything from a ban on coyote-killing contests to a new labor law and a provision about migratory corridors for wildlife.

Whether these issues ever clear the high bar to make it on the ballot, the number of such proposals is unusual and could mark an end to the relative obscurity of a rarely used section in the state constitution that allows voters to repeal laws through the ballot box. It also could be the start of a new reckoning over New Mexico’s tight limits on direct democracy, which were born in the era of robber barons but today exist in stark contrast to neighboring states like Colorado, where voters wield broader power at the polls.

Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver has refused to certify proposed petitions for a referendum on a gun background check law, Senate Bill 8, noting that the New Mexico Constitution does not allow for referendums on laws “providing for the preservation of the public peace, health or safety.”

House Republican leaders and Nick Maxwell, a private citizen from Hobbs, had submitted such proposals. House Republicans have not ruled out taking the issue to court, arguing it is not up to the secretary of state to unilaterally decide whether the issue falls under the “public peace, health or safety” category.

The other proposed referendums, put forward by an organization called the Roosevelt County Patriots, might not fall under the same exception.

The organization describes itself as seeking to “build an alliance among residents of Roosevelt County, against the unconstitutional laws being ramrodded through in Santa Fe,” referring to what it describes as “anti-gun measures, anti-wall, anti-oil/gas industry or the extreme measures recently pushed through for abortion.”

The group submitted three proposed petitions earlier this month. One called for a vote on SB 76, bipartisan legislation to ban coyote-killing contests. Another called for a vote on House Bill 85, which prohibits local governments from creating so-called right-to-work laws by banning unions from requiring that employees pay fees as part of an employment contract. The third called for a vote on repealing SB 228, a Democratic bill that calls on state officials to create a plan for protecting wildlife corridors.

The Secretary of State’s Office initially rejected each for technical reasons. But the group plans to resubmit the proposed petitions.

A spokesman for the office said this week it had not determined whether the laws targeted by Roosevelt County Patriots fall under the “public peace, health or safety” provision of the state constitution.

But there are other provisions limiting which laws qualify for what is also known as a veto referendum.

The constitution does not allow referendums on the state budget, on laws “for the maintenance of the public schools or state institutions,” or on “local or special laws.”

To get a referendum on the ballot, proponents would need to gather more than 70,000 signatures from at least 10 percent of the qualified electors of three-fourths of the state’s counties.

That is a relatively high bar.

Still, the state has not seen this much interest in a referendum since a 2009 effort by law enforcement officials to repeal a law that banned the death penalty in New Mexico. The campaign never got the issue on the ballot.

New Mexico has only held three such referendums and has only repealed one law through the process: an excise tax on cigarettes in 1930.

Source: US Government Class

Joe Biden says he’s running for president, in video announcing bid

“We are in the battle for the soul of this nation,” he said in the nearly four-minute long video. “If we give Donald Trump eight years in the White House he will forever and fundamentally alter the character of this nation. And I cannot stand by and watch that happen.”

Unlike most of his competitors who only mentioned President Trump in passing when they announced their candidacies, Biden used his video to cast the race as a battle with Mr. Trump for the very soul and character of the country, calling him out by name.

The video opens in Charlottesville, Virginia, the scene of violent clashes between white nationalists and protesters which opens in Charlottesville, Virginia, where in 2017 there were violent clashes between white nationalists and protesters that resulted in the death of one woman. Mr. Trump, at the time, faced a backlash for saying that blame for the violence fell “on many sides.”

Biden announced his bid in a video released on social media. He is expected to hold a fundraiser Thursday evening in Philadelphia and hold his first formal campaign event in Pittsburgh on Monday. In his appeal to voters, Biden recounted the president’s response to the violent white supremacist protests in Charlottesville, Virginia two years ago.

Biden said he’s running for president because everything about American democracy is “at stake” under a Trump presidency. “We have to remember who we are, this is America,” he added in a final appeal to supporters.

Already differentiating himself from the other 17 candidates running, Biden also immediately released Spanish-language advertising to target Latino supporters, which no other candidate did on day one of his or her campaign.

For about a year, many Democratic operatives, donors and voters have been encouraging Biden, who served as vice president for eight years under President Obama, to enter the crowded race, capture the nomination and thwart Mr. Trump’s reelection bid in 2020. Despite not having formally announced his bid until Thursday, Biden has been leading several polls among primary voters, with only Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders coming close to matching the former vice president’s support.

People familiar with the campaign’s plans said Biden plans to place a particular emphasis on South Carolina, an early primary state where he enjoys strong support from longtime Democratic leaders and the state’s large African American community.

The 76-year-old former Delaware lawmaker, a totem of the Democratic Party’s establishment, is likely to quickly attract substantial financial support from the party’s more moderate wing, as well as the backing of many top Democrats across the country and in Washington, where he worked for decades.

Unlike many of the other Democratic candidates in the race, Biden is already a household name across the country, and his allies argue he has the best chance to woo working-class voters in states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania who propelled Mr. Trump to victory during the 2016 presidential election.

The former vice president, however, will also face scrutiny from progressives for some of the positions he held during his long tenure in Congress, where he represented Delaware in the Senate for more than 35 years. He has also come under scrutiny in recent weeks by several women who said that he touched them inappropriately at events over the years.

In the 1970s, Biden opposed busing to desegregate public schools. As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, he oversaw the contentious Anita Hill hearings during the confirmation process for then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991. He also helped spearhead efforts to pass the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which many believe fueled a period of mass incarceration that disproportionately affected African Americans and other minority groups.

Biden has since embraced more progressive policy stances. He staged two campaigns for the Democratic nomination in 1988 and 2008, dropping out during the primary contests in both.

The former vice president joins the largest — and the most diverse — Democratic primary field in U.S. history. To date, 20 other Democrats have declared their candidacy for president, including Sens. Sanders, Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Elizabeth Warren; Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke; and South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

Ed O’Keefe, Emily Tillett and Caitlin Huey-Burns contributed to this report.

Source: US Government Class

New Mexico County Declares Local Emergency Over Abandoned Border Patrol Checkpoints

NPR – For people familiar with the lonesome highways of far West Texas and New Mexico, it’s an unusual sight: the ubiquitous Border Patrol checkpoints are all closed. Last month, Homeland Security shifted the checkpoint agents to the border to help process the crush of migrant asylum-seekers.

Otero County, N.M., is so alarmed by the possibility of illegal narcotics flowing north unchecked that it has declared a local state of emergency.

Normally, if you drive from Las Cruces to Alamogordo, N.M., on U.S. Route 70, you have to pull into a federal inspection station. A stern, green-suited agent asks if you’re a U.S. citizen, while another one with a dog sniffs your car for drugs.

Nowadays, traffic roars past orange cones that block the entrance to the checkpoint. Customs and Border Protection has closed all six checkpoints in the El Paso Sector — which covers West Texas and New Mexico. Checkpoints elsewhere along the southern border are operating normally.

That riles Couy Griffin. He wears a wide-brimmed cowboy hat, and owns a nearby barbecue cafe whose trademark is a giant replica of a six-gun. “Where we’re at right now … this Border Patrol checkpoint is closed down. It’s in place to provide security. And now it’s left abandoned,” Griffin says, standing in the empty lanes of the inspection pavilion.

Griffin, chairman of the Otero County Board of Commissioners, was the force behind the surprise move last week when the county declared a state of emergency over the shuttered checkpoint.

“What I’m really hoping comes out of [this emergency declaration] is that our governor will recommission the National Guard which she pulled off of the border earlier this year,” he says.

Earlier this year, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham withdrew 118 National Guard troops from New Mexico’s southern boundary, calling President Trump’s policies a “charade of border fear-mongering.”

Since then, the El Paso Sector has been overwhelmed by illegal crossers. They’re apprehending 600 migrants a day — a 1,600% increase over the same time period last year.

So the Otero commissioners — all Trump supporters — asked the Democratic governor to redeploy National Guard to the checkpoints to stand in for overtaxed border officers.

The governor says if Otero County wants the checkpoints re-staffed, they should write a letter to CBP, not the governor’s office.

“They haven’t given me any information about a state or county emergency except that they’re mad the checkpoint is closed,” she says in a phone interview from Santa Fe. “The National Guard cannot do immigration work. So they can’t man that checkpoint. They can’t make arrests. It doesn’t make any sense.”

There’s no dispute the Border Patrol’s 71 traffic checkpoints all along the Southwest border seize lots of dope. Since Oct. 1, checkpoint agents have discovered seven tons of marijuana, and nearly a ton and a half of meth inside vehicles, according to CBP’s own statistics.

Otero County Sheriff David Black is convinced the loss of the checkpoint on U.S. Route 54, south of Alamogordo has been a boon to smugglers. “What we’re seeing here now is a huge influx in drugs. I mean, the highway’s wide open. There’s no checkpoints. Nothing,” he says.

Before the checkpoints were closed, Black was sending his narcotics investigators out there two to three times a week to make drug arrests. He says informants are now telling him that Mexican traffickers know if they can get their product across the Rio Grande — the border with Mexico — they have a free ride north. He says his deputies are doing more highway interdictions to search vehicles, but they can’t compensate for the loss of the federal inspection station.

“This is my hometown,” Black says, “Born and raised right here in Otero County. I got grandkids in the schools. And this stuff is just piling into our community right now.”

Otero County officials are not the only ones complaining. CBP has reassigned 750 agents from ports of entry to help process the wave of asylum applicants. U.S. and Mexican trade interests up and down the border are griping that border crossings are so understaffed, the wait for commercial traffic is now counted in hours, not minutes.

In a statement, CBP writes, “This is a temporary measure. Checkpoints are integral to the Border Patrol’s security mission.”

No date was given for their reopening.

Source: US Government Class

Supreme Court case could help pick 2024 election winners

(CNN) – The US Supreme Court will soon decide a case that could impact the 2024 presidential election. Arguments are scheduled for Tuesday.

That’s not a typo: A case decided this year could impact significantly who wins the presidency five years from now.

The case involves the all-important citizenship question that the Trump administration wants to include in the 2020 census: “Is this person a citizen of the United States.” Seemingly innocuous on its face, the question could alter both congressional apportionment and the presidential election.

Experts say that including this question will undercount urban areas with high minority populations. That’s because the question will make it less likely that racial minorities and noncitizens will answer the census at all. The Trump administration has made illegal immigration a major focus. Can anyone fault a minority person from being fearful of governmental efforts, in this political e, to learn their citizenship status?

If minority communities fail to answer the census, then areas of high minority populations, such as Latino communities, will likely suffer an undercount. That would reduce their political representation.

Under the US Constitution, the federal government must count every person in the country every 10 years as part of the census. The results affect the number of congressional representatives each state receives, dictate the provision of federal tax dollars to the states and cities, and have a slew of other consequences.

Perhaps most significantly, the census results have a major impact on our elections.

The US House of Representatives has 435 seats. By taking the total population of the country and dividing by 435, the census numbers provide the average size of each congressional district. In 2010, that number was 710,767 residents per district. (The District of Columbia, with a population of around 700,000, still receives zero members of Congress, though it does have three votes in the Electoral College.) The number of congressional representatives that states receive is based on their respective state populations, using the average district size as the guidepost.

States may gain or lose congressional seats based on population shifts in the country over the preceding decade. After the 2010 census, for instance, Texas gained four seats and Florida gained two seats; New York and Ohio each lost two.

These changes alter the Electoral College as well: The number of electors in each state is equal to the number of congressional representatives plus two (the number of US Senators per state). Thus, after the 2010 census, Texas and Florida increased their Electoral College votes while New York and Ohio’s electoral votes went down.

Once states know how many people reside in the state, they then must undertake the process of redistricting, where they redraw their congressional (and state) lines to comply with the principle of one person, one vote: Each district must have roughly the same number of people. Local governments must also redraw their local lines, such as for city council. The census numbers are provided down to the block level so that states know exactly how many people live in specific areas, helping them to comply with the one person, one vote requirement for each district.

Importantly, the US Constitution provides that representatives are to be awarded to the states by “counting the whole number of persons in each State.” Thus, the Constitution requires congressional apportionment based on total population, not the number of US citizens. We count everyone who resides in the country, regardless of their citizenship status, and apportion the representatives accordingly.

This makes sense, because a member of Congress represents everyone in their district even if a person is ineligible to vote. No one would suggest that a person under 18 is not represented just because they can’t yet vote; the same goes for someone who has not gained their citizenship.

As the briefing in the Supreme Court notes, a governmental memo suggested that the citizenship question would result in an undercount of around 6.5 million individuals. The census will reveal fewer people living in certain areas than the reality, all because the government seeks more information than is necessary in an effort to scare them into not participating.

The Electoral College already favors rural states; a citizenship question that undercounts states with heavy concentrations of noncitizens in urban areas would dilute the influence of more populous states even further. The citizenship question could therefore change the Electoral College math in 2024, the next presidential election after the census is complete.

Of course, there’s a political motivation to all of this: urban areas tend to vote for Democrats, and the citizenship question has the potential to reduce the number of representatives and federal dollars in cities with heavy Latino populations. Thus, the real goal is to change the political map.

This all comes before the process of redistricting even starts in 2021, which itself is fraught with political gamesmanship in many places. Indeed, several states have moved to independent redistricting commissions, as I profile in a new book, thanks to the hard work of “democracy champions” advocating for nonpartisan reforms, all in an effort to remove politics from the process of allocating representatives. The citizenship question inappropriately inserts politics into the very data that goes into redistricting, moving up the political maneuvering even earlier in the process.

Three federal courts have already struck down the citizenship question, ruling that the Trump administration could not adequately justify the reasons for the question. The Supreme Court will weigh in soon. The legal issues are somewhat separate from the political ramifications. But either way, shouldn’t our elections depend on the best candidates and the best ideas winning, and not the rules of the game? That’s what a fair democracy should be all about.

Source: US Government Class